In which situations are Security Forces authorized to make arrests?

Security Forces are authorized to make arrests when they either directly witness a crime being committed or possess probable cause to believe that a crime has taken place. Probable cause means that there are reasonable grounds for suspicion based on facts or circumstances known to the officer at the time. This standard is critical, as it balances the need for law enforcement to act decisively in the face of potential criminal activity while also safeguarding individuals' rights.

The rationale behind allowing arrests under these conditions is to enable Security Forces to respond effectively to threats to safety and order. In essence, this authority is grounded in the concept of protecting the community and ensuring adherence to the law. The immediacy and direct observation of criminal activity create a compelling justification for taking action without needing to go through additional legal processes, such as obtaining a warrant.

In contrast, other options may not align with the legal standards governing arrests. For example, receiving a tip-off from a civilian might provide valuable information but does not meet the threshold of witnessing a crime or having probable cause. Similarly, routine inspections may not inherently indicate criminal behavior that justifies an arrest, and while warrants are important in many legal situations, Security Forces are trained to act without one when immediate circumstances dictate the need for intervention.